Court of Appeals of Maryland· 5/19/2008
Janice M. v. Margaret K.
Citations
- 948 A.2d 73
- 404 Md. 661
- 2008 Md. LEXIS 255
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that Maryland does not recognize de facto parenthood
- stating that “‘parent in fact’” is the “literal meaning” of de facto parent
- declining to recognize de facto parent as a legal status in Maryland and holding that in order for the court to grant visitation for former same-sex partner, it must find that the mother was an unfit parent or that exceptional circumstances existed
- “The issues ... could arise in a myriad of other circumstances, including disputes involving step-parents, grandparents, and parties in a relationship with ‘a significant other’ ”
- \The issue of whether same-sex couples may adopt a child in Maryland has not been briefed in this case and we express no opinion on the issue\
- “[E]xceptional circumstances are not established through a rigid test, but rather by an analysis of all of the factors before the court in a particular case.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bell, Raker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Kulstad v. ManiaciMontana Supreme Court· 2009-10-06· cited 43×
- Smith v. GuestSupreme Court of Delaware· 2011-03-14· cited 35×
- Egan v. Fridlund-HorneCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2009-04-14· cited 30×
- Conover v. ConoverCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2016-07-07· cited 30×
- Ross v. Cecil County Department of Social ServicesD. Maryland· 2012-07-12· cited 19×
- Moreau v. Sylvester, Sylvester v. MoreauSupreme Court of Vermont· 2014-04-04· cited 17×
- Barrett v. AyresCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2009-06-03· cited 13×
- Smith v. GordonSupreme Court of Delaware· 2009-02-03· cited 11×
- Kpetigo v. KpetigoCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2018-08-30· cited 10×
- Aumiller v. AumillerCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2008-10-31· cited 9×
- DeWolfe v. RichmondCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2013-09-25· cited 9×
- Green v. GreenCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2009-10-30· cited 8×
- E.N. v. T.R.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2021-07-12· cited 7×
- Lindsey v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2014-08-27· cited 5×
- In Re VICTORIA C.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2014-03-27· cited 4×
- In re Victoria C.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2012-11-26· cited 4×
- Conover v. ConoverCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2015-08-26· cited 3×
- E.N. v. T.R.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2020-08-25· cited 2×
- Y.Y. v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2012-06-27· cited 1×
- (2010)Maryland Attorney General Reports· 2010-02-23
Cites
56 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court· 1982-02-22· cited 9,761×
- Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court· 2000-06-05· cited 6,943×
- Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1972-04-03· cited 5,889×
- Meyer v. NebraskaSupreme Court· 1923-06-04· cited 3,363×
- Prince v. MassachusettsSupreme Court· 1944-03-27· cited 2,515×
- N.A.H. v. S.L.S.Supreme Court of Colorado· 2000-09-11· cited 448×
- MTR. OF SHONDEL J. v. Mark D.New York Court of Appeals· 2006-07-06· cited 326×
- Smith v. Stillwell-SmithWashington Supreme Court· 1998-12-24· cited 313×
- W.C. ex rel. A.M.K.Colorado Court of Appeals· 1995-10-12· cited 190×
- V.C. v. M.J.B.Supreme Court of New Jersey· 2000-04-06· cited 172×
- Rideout v. RiendeauSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2000-11-13· cited 170×
- Roth v. WestonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2002-01-29· cited 160×
- T.B. v. L.R.M.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2001-12-28· cited 157×
- In Re Parentage of LBWashington Supreme Court· 2005-11-03· cited 146×
- Ross v. HoffmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1977-04-25· cited 145×
- Blixt v. BlixtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2002-09-09· cited 140×
- Dua v. Comcast Cable of Maryland, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2002-08-29· cited 135×
- In Re Custody of HSHKWisconsin Supreme Court· 1995-06-13· cited 133×
- Carvin v. BritainWashington Supreme Court· 2005-11-03· cited 128×
- Moriarty v. BradtSupreme Court of New Jersey· 2003-07-14· cited 127×
Other cases named Janice M. v. Margaret K.
2 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.