Daniel Anthony Miller v. Prince George's County, Maryland, a Body Corporate and Politic John L. Dougans

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an officer cannot intentionally or with reckless disregard for the truth make materially false statements or omit material facts from an arrest warrant affidavit
• holding that an officer cannot intentionally or with reckless disregard for the truth make materially false statements or omit material facts from an arrest warrant affidavit
• holding that a falsehood in an application for an arrest warrant does not violate the Constitution if it is not necessary to the finding of probable cause
• holding that the plaintiff stated a valid § 1983 claim against an officer who allegedly submitted a warrant affidavit with intentional or reckless material misrepresentations
• holding that an officer violates Franks when he omits from the affidavit “material facts with the intent to make, or with reckless disregard of whether [he] thereby made, the affidavit misleading” (citation omitted)
• holding in probable-cause-for-arrest case that an individual was seized even though he was “mistakenly thought to be another”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).