Supreme Court· 5/17/1982
Greene v. Lindsey
Citations
- 456 U.S. 444
- 102 S. Ct. 1874
- 72 L. Ed. 2d 249
- 1982 U.S. LEXIS 114
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that continued residency in leasehold property is a \significant interest in property\ subject to due process protection
- “It suffices for present purposes that we are confident that additional reasonable steps were available for Arkansas to employ before taking Jones’ property.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brennan, White, Marshall, Blackmun, Powell, Stevens, O'Connor, Burger, Rehnquist
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
265 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Mennonite Board of Missions v. AdamsSupreme Court· 1983-06-22· cited 1,416×
- Dusenbery v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2002-01-08· cited 924×
- Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc. v. PopeSupreme Court· 1988-04-19· cited 906×
- Jones v. FlowersSupreme Court· 2006-04-26· cited 901×
- In the Interest of E.R.Texas Supreme Court· 2012-07-06· cited 418×
- Department of Housing and Urban Development v. RuckerSupreme Court· 2002-03-26· cited 319×
- Grayden v. RhodesEleventh Circuit· 2003-09-17· cited 294×
- People ex rel. J.C.S.Colorado Court of Appeals· 2007-07-12· cited 194×
- State v. HochhauslerOhio Supreme Court· 1996-07-30· cited 178×
- Josephine Weigner v. The City of New YorkSecond Circuit· 1988-07-14· cited 166×
- Christopher B. Propert v. District of Columbia, a Municipal CorporationD.C. Circuit· 1991-11-19· cited 152×
- Keith Stansell v. Revolutionary Armed Forces of Columbia, (FARC)Eleventh Circuit· 2014-10-16· cited 128×
- Cate v. Archon Oil Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma· 1985-02-19· cited 123×
- Joseph Peters v. National Railroad Passenger CorporationD.C. Circuit· 1992-06-16· cited 117×
- In Re Adoption of BGSSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1990-02-05· cited 100×
- Harry R. Carlile Trust v. Cotton Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma· 1986-05-05· cited 100×
- In Interest of AWNebraska Supreme Court· 1987-02-20· cited 99×
- McCann v. ScadutoNew York Court of Appeals· 1987-12-23· cited 95×
- Hall v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1989-02-09· cited 91×
- Appeal of H.R.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1990-08-29· cited 85×
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1945-12-03· cited 18,588×
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court· 1950-06-05· cited 10,395×
- Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court· 1977-06-24· cited 2,976×
- Ferguson v. SkrupaSupreme Court· 1963-04-22· cited 1,026×
- Lindsey v. NormetSupreme Court· 1972-02-23· cited 901×
- Grannis v. OrdeanSupreme Court· 1914-06-08· cited 732×
- Schroeder v. City of New YorkSupreme Court· 1962-12-17· cited 569×
- McDonald v. MabeeSupreme Court· 1917-03-06· cited 322×
- North Laramie Land Co. v. HoffmanSupreme Court· 1925-05-11· cited 192×
- Tyler v. Judges of the Court of RegistrationSupreme Court· 1900-12-17· cited 164×
- The MARY, Stafford, MastfSupreme Court· 1815-02-25· cited 152×
- Huling v. Kaw Valley Railway & Improvement Co.Supreme Court· 1889-05-13· cited 118×
- Tyler v. Judges of Court of RegistrationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1900-01-03· cited 97×
- Longyear v. ToolanSupreme Court· 1908-04-06· cited 35×
- George Velazquez v. Edward Thompson, as Administrative Judge of the Civil Court of the City of New YorkSecond Circuit· 1971-11-03· cited 15×
- Linnie Lindsey, Barbara Hodgens and Pamela Ray v. Joseph Greene and Unknown Deputy SheriffsSixth Circuit· 1981-05-18· cited 8×
- Weber v. Grand Lodge of Kentucky, F. & A. M.Sixth Circuit· 1909-05-13· cited 8×
Other cases named Greene v. Lindsey
3 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.