Davis v. Slater

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that because “interpretation of the Maryland Declaration of Rights and Constitution ... [is] appropriately classified as [a] question[ ] of law, we review the issue[] de novo”
• stating that “[b]ecause our interpretation of ... provisions of the Maryland Code ... are appropriately classified as questions of law, we review the issues de novo to determine if the trial court was legally correct in its rulings on these matters”
• stating that “[bjecause our interpretation of ... provisions of the Maryland Code ... are appropriately classified as questions of law, we review the issues de novo to determine if the trial court was legally correct in its rulings on these matters.”
• stating that “[bjecause our interpretation of ... provisions of the Maryland Code ... are appropriately classified as questions of law, we review the issues de novo to determine if the trial court was legally correct in its rulings on these matters”
• noting that because “provisions of the Maryland Code, and the Maryland Rules are appropriately classified as questions of law, we review the issues de novo to determine if the trial court was legally correct in its rulings on these matters.”
• “When interpreting constitutional provisions, we generally employ the same rules of construction that are applicable to the construction of statutory language”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).