Supreme Court of South Carolina· 7/5/2018
Pertuis v. Front Roe Restaurants, Inc.
Citations
- 817 S.E.2d 273
- 423 S.C. 640
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- determining that veil piercing actions are such disputes that reach beyond the confines of a corporation
- stating the application of the single-business-enterprise doctrine requires the party seeking to employ the doctrine to show (1) the various entities operations are intertwined and (2
- explaining the single business enterprise theory should only be applied after substantial reflection
- considering whether corporate 43 structure has been abused to circumvent a statute
- considering whether corporate 43 structure has been abused to circumvent a statute
- applying forum state’s law because “although ‘[v]eil piercing cases implicate corporate law[, they] involve disputes that reach beyond the confines of the corporation’ ” (quoting 1 WILLIAM MEADE FLETCHER ET AL., FLETCHER CYCLOPEDIA OF THE LAW OF CORPORATIONS § 43.72 (2015))
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kittredge
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Walbeck v. I'On Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2018-08-08· cited 11×
- Stoneledge At Lake Keowee Owners' Ass'n, Inc. v. Imk Dev. Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2018-10-10· cited 4×
- Wilson v. GandisSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2020-06-03
- Tyler Dix, Jason Cattell, Jimmy McCann, and Julie Eller v. Casey's General Stores, Inc. and Casey's Marketing CompanySupreme Court of Iowa· 2021-06-25
- Stoneledge at Lake Keowee v. IMK Development Co., LLCSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2021-12-08
- Brad Walbeck v. The I'On CompanySupreme Court of South Carolina· 2023-02-08
- Mortimer, R., Aplt. v. McCool, M.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2021-07-21
- Mortimer, R., Aplt. v. 340 Associates, LLCSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2021-07-21
- Kaiser-Francis Oil Company and Aurora-KF, LLC v. Deutsche Oel & Gas, S.A., Rieck Oil, Inc., and Kay RieckAlaska Supreme Court· 2025-03-28
- John A. Tibbs v. 3M Company; 4520 Corp., Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2026-05-27
Cites
24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Futch v. McAllister Towing of Georgetown, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1999-07-26· cited 1,327×
- Edgar v. Mite Corp.Supreme Court· 1982-06-23· cited 795×
- Wilder Corp. v. WilkeSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1998-03-09· cited 665×
- Atherton v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.Supreme Court· 1997-01-14· cited 279×
- SSP Partners v. Gladstrong Investments (USA) Corp.Texas Supreme Court· 2008-11-14· cited 206×
- Las Palmas Associates v. Las Palmas Center AssociatesCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1991-11-05· cited 186×
- Atlantic Coast Builders & Contractors, LLC v. LewisSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2012-05-16· cited 154×
- Kennedy v. Columbia Lumber & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1989-09-25· cited 119×
- Green v. Champion Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1991-03-05· cited 116×
- Herron v. CENTURY BMWSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2011-12-19· cited 110×
- Sturkie v. SiflyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1984-02-17· cited 56×
- Silk v. TerrillTexas Supreme Court· 1995-06-22· cited 40×
- Pope v. Heritage Communities, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2011-09-14· cited 30×
- Drury Development Corp. v. Foundation InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2008-11-03· cited 26×
- Magnolia North Property Owners' Ass'n v. Heritage Communities, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2012-02-15· cited 26×
- South Carolina Department of Transportation v. Horry CountySupreme Court of South Carolina· 2011-01-18· cited 22×
- Kincaid v. Landing Development Corp.Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1986-05-19· cited 20×
- Tac-Critical Systems, Inc. v. Integrated Facility Systems, Inc.District of Columbia· 2011-09-02· cited 19×
- Mid-South Management Co. v. Sherwood Development Corp.Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2007-06-29· cited 15×
- Ballard v. RobersonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2012-08-29· cited 12×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.