Pertuis v. Front Roe Restaurants, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining that veil piercing actions are such disputes that reach beyond the confines of a corporation
• stating the application of the single-business-enterprise doctrine requires the party seeking to employ the doctrine to show (1) the various entities operations are intertwined and (2
• explaining the single business enterprise theory should only be applied after substantial reflection
• considering whether corporate 43 structure has been abused to circumvent a statute
• considering whether corporate 43 structure has been abused to circumvent a statute
• applying forum state’s law because “although ‘[v]eil piercing cases implicate corporate law[, they] involve disputes that reach beyond the confines of the corporation’ ” (quoting 1 WILLIAM MEADE FLETCHER ET AL., FLETCHER CYCLOPEDIA OF THE LAW OF CORPORATIONS § 43.72 (2015))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).