Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Supreme Court of South Carolina· 3/9/1998

Wilder Corp. v. Wilke

Citations

  • 497 S.E.2d 731
  • 330 S.C. 71
  • 1998 S.C. LEXIS 46

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an objection must be sufficiently specific to inform the trial court of the point being urged by the objector
  • holding that a specific argument that was neither raised to nor ruled upon by the trial court is not properly preserved for consideration on appeal
  • holding that an issue not raised to or ruled upon by the trial court is not preserved for appeal
  • holding that an issue cannot be raised for the first time on appeal, but must have been raised to and ruled upon by the trial court to be preserved for appellate review
  • holding that an issue cannot be raised for the first time on appeal, but must have been raised to and rule upon by the trial judge to be preserved for appellate review
  • holding that an issue cannot be raised for the first time on appeal, but must have been raised to and ruled upon by the trial judge to be preserved for appellate review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Toal, Finney, Moore, Waller, Burnett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

201 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Wilder Corp. v. Wilke

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.