· 11/3/2008
Drury Development Corp. v. Foundation Insurance
Citations
- 668 S.E.2d 798
- 380 S.C. 97
- 2008 S.C. LEXIS 321
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that veil piercing is a means of imposing liability, not a separate claim
- “so long as the plaintiff has pled facts sufficient to survive a motion to dismiss as to the corporate liability claims and the alter ego claim, the trial court should move forward”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Toal, Waller, Pleicones, Beatty, Kittredge
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.