Skip to main content
· 11/3/2008

Drury Development Corp. v. Foundation Insurance

Citations

  • 668 S.E.2d 798
  • 380 S.C. 97
  • 2008 S.C. LEXIS 321

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that veil piercing is a means of imposing liability, not a separate claim
  • “so long as the plaintiff has pled facts sufficient to survive a motion to dismiss as to the corporate liability claims and the alter ego claim, the trial court should move forward”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Toal, Waller, Pleicones, Beatty, Kittredge

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.