Skip to main content
· 2/8/2023

Brad Walbeck v. The I'On Company

Syllabus

This case involves promises made and broken to homeowners by a developer and its affiliated entities. Following a trial, the jury awarded verdicts to the homeowners, but the court of appeals reversed. We reinstate the jury's verdict affirming in part and reversing in part.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a debt for fraud committed by a debtor’s business partner—fraud she herself had not committed but was also liable for—was nondischargeable under § 523(a)(2)(A)
  • stating that Congress intended for the Bankruptcy Code to “strike[] a balance between the interests of insolvent debtors and their creditors”
  • equating “plain and ordinary meaning” with what “an ordinary English speaker would understand [a] sentence to mean”
  • “We have never used this principle to artificially narrow ordinary meaning, which is what Bartenwerfer asks us to do.”
  • “We start where we always do: with the text of the statute.”
  • “Partnerships and other businesses can also organize as limited-liability entities.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.