Appellate Court of Illinois· 7/9/1991

People v. Lendabarker

Citations

575 N.E.2d 568
215 Ill. App. 3d 540
159 Ill. Dec. 70
1991 Ill. App. LEXIS 1181

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that the State was on notice because notice was filed with the court clerk and mailed to the State's Attorney
speedy-trial demand valid and effective when it was filed with clerk of circuit court and notice of the demand was sent to State’s Attorney’s office
delay occasioned by defense counsel’s request to conduct research on indictment is attributable to defendant, and the delay caused by defendant’s filing of motions is ordinarily chargeable to defendant
speedy-trial demand valid and effective when it was filed with clerk of circuit court and -9- 1-05-3741 notice of the demand was sent to State's Attorney's office
delay occasioned by defense counsel's request to conduct research on indictment is attributable to defendant, and the delay caused by defendant's filing of motions is ordinarily chargeable to defendant
where court had already set April 10 date on State’s motion and defense counsel came in on April 6 to request continuance, four-day period was not chargeable to defendant because it caused no delay; only period after April 10 constituted actual delay attributable to defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Reinhard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.