California Supreme Court· 1/31/2005

People v. Young

Citations

105 P.3d 487
24 Cal. Rptr. 3d 112
34 Cal. 4th 1149
2005 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 856
2005 Daily Journal DAR 1209
2005 Cal. LEXIS 1017

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that the “[resolution of conflicts and inconsistencies in the testimony is the exclusive province of the trier of fact”
“In resolving the question of whether, as a matter of law, the evidence raised a reasonable doubt as to defendant’s mental competence, we may consider all the relevant facts in the record.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brown

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

232 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

173 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named People v. Young

627 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.