United States v. Charles A. Comiskey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that no evidence was required to support a certification under 18 U.S.C. §3731
• holding certification need not allege \specific evidentiary facts which constitute substantial proof of the charge alleged against defendant.\
• holding certification need not allege \specific evidentiary facts which constitute substantial proof of the charge alleged against defendant.\
• holding certification need not allege “specific evidentiary facts which constitute substantial proof of the charge alleged against defendant.”
• holding that no evidence was 1989
• certification of United States Attorney that interlocutory appeal is not being taken for purposes of delay

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).