Skip to main content

People v. Young

Citations

  • 376 N.E.2d 712
  • 60 Ill. App. 3d 49
  • 17 Ill. Dec. 566
  • 1978 Ill. App. LEXIS 2618

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that the trial court, having ruled to suppress the State’s evidence, was at that point divested of the jurisdiction to direct an acquittal, even though it had failed to order termination of the trial as directed by statute
  • finding that the trial court, having ruled to suppress the State’s evidence, was at that point divested of the jurisdiction to direct an acquittal, even though it had failed to order termination of the trial as directed by statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nash

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.