Supreme Court of Colorado· 6/20/1983
People v. Walker
Citations
- 666 P.2d 113
- 1983 Colo. LEXIS 574
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that the court had considered the witness's prior opportunity to observe the defendant and her \cool demeanor\ as the crime occurred
- likening a witness’s first-time confrontation with a defendant in court to a one-on-one show-up
- likening a witness's first-time confrontation with a defendant in court to a one-on-one show-up
- Although cross-examination which focuses on motive is liberally permitted, court’s restriction properly “prevented the sideshow from taking over the circus.”
- in determining extent of required disclosure of complaints about police officer's alleged use of excessive force, no distinction between sustained and unsustained complaints
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Neighbors
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
44 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- People v. RodriguezSupreme Court of Colorado· 1996-04-15· cited 1,618×
- Edwards v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 2006-02-13· cited 962×
- People v. CurtisSupreme Court of Colorado· 1984-04-23· cited 530×
- Kogan v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 1988-05-09· cited 194×
- Garner v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 2019-03-18· cited 193×
- Merritt v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 1992-11-23· cited 106×
- State v. RoySupreme Court of Vermont· 1989-01-13· cited 85×
- People v. GermanySupreme Court of Colorado· 1983-11-15· cited 79×
- People v. CarterColorado Court of Appeals· 2015-03-12· cited 63×
- People v. WellerSupreme Court of Colorado· 1984-04-09· cited 59×
- People v. SPYKSTRASupreme Court of Colorado· 2010-06-21· cited 46×
- Chambers v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 1984-05-21· cited 40×
- People v. KnightColorado Court of Appeals· 2006-11-30· cited 37×
- Waits v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 1986-09-29· cited 33×
- People v. KennyColorado Court of Appeals· 2001-01-25· cited 33×
- Mitchell v. StateIdaho Supreme Court· 1998-11-25· cited 32×
- People v. JamesColorado Court of Appeals· 2001-04-26· cited 30×
- Bonser v. ShainholtzSupreme Court of Colorado· 2000-06-12· cited 29×
- People v. MonroeSupreme Court of Colorado· 1996-10-09· cited 23×
- People v. PortleyColorado Court of Appeals· 1992-12-17· cited 17×
Cites
42 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1980-04-15· cited 7,618×
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court· 1972-12-06· cited 7,056×
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1968-03-18· cited 6,700×
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court· 1967-06-12· cited 6,066×
- Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court· 1977-06-16· cited 5,119×
- Johnson v. New JerseySupreme Court· 1966-06-20· cited 3,002×
- Linkletter v. WalkerSupreme Court· 1965-06-07· cited 2,898×
- United States v. JohnsonSupreme Court· 1982-06-21· cited 1,037×
- Tehan v. United States Ex Rel. ShottSupreme Court· 1965-11-15· cited 740×
- Moore v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1977-12-12· cited 676×
- Williams v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1971-04-05· cited 659×
- Tehan v. United States ex rel. ShottSupreme Court· 1966-01-19· cited 593×
- Adams v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1972-03-06· cited 312×
- Ivan v. v. City of New YorkSupreme Court· 1972-06-12· cited 268×
- People v. ZamoraCalifornia Supreme Court· 1980-08-28· cited 126×
- Martinelli v. DIST. COURT IN & FOR CITY, ETC.Supreme Court of Colorado· 1980-02-04· cited 92×
- People v. ChavezSupreme Court of Colorado· 1981-01-05· cited 80×
- People v. ThorpeSupreme Court of Colorado· 1982-02-08· cited 77×
- People v. SmithSupreme Court of Colorado· 1981-01-05· cited 69×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.