Supreme Court of Colorado· 10/9/1996

People v. Monroe

Citations

925 P.2d 767
1996 WL 536959

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

acknowledging the trial court’s discretion to order in-person lineups or Crim. P. 41.1 nontestimonial identifications
acknowledging the trial court's discretion to order in-person lineups or Crim. P. 41.1 nontestimonial identifications
acknowledging Big-gers and Manson but accounting for \the witness's own observations at the time of the crime\ only after determining that \a substantial likelihood of irreparable misidentifi-cation exists\ for the suggestiveness of the procedure alone
acknowledging Biggers and Manson but accounting for \the witness's own observations at the time of the crime\ only after determining that \a substantial likelihood of irreparable misidentification exists\ for the suggestiveness of the procedure alone
\Juries are not so susceptible that they cannot measure intelligently the weight of identification testimony that has some questionable feature.\ (quoting Manson v. Brathwaite, 432 U.S. 98, 116, 97 S.Ct. 2243, 53 L.Ed.2d 140 (1977))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hobbs

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.