Ivan v. v. City of New York

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that criminal standard of proof beyond reasonable doubt applied retroactively
• In re Winship, 397 U.S. 358, 90 S.Ct. 1068, 25 L.Ed.2d 368 (1970), holding the reasonable doubt standard governs juvenile delinquency proceedings, applied retroactively
• Winship, holding the reasonable doubt standard governs juvenile delinquency proceedings, applied retroactively
• gave full retroactivity to the In re Winship, 397 U.S. 358, 90 S.Ct. 1068, 25 L.Ed.2d 368 (1970), proof beyond a reasonable doubt standard at juvenile hearings
• purpose of reasonable doubt standard is “to overcome an aspect of a criminal trial that substantially impairs the truth-finding function, and Winship is thus to be given complete retroactive effect”
• In re Winship, 397 U.S. 358, 25 L. Ed. 2d 368, 90 S. Ct. 1068 (1970), holding the reasonable doubt standard governs juvenile delinquency proceedings, applied retroactively

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).