Chambers v. People

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding no prejudice where the defendant failed to indicate how the belated production of a relevant scientific report prejudiced his case
• Referring to an earlier, but analogous, sexual assault statute, the court stated that “[t]he offense of first degree sexual assault requires that the actor have an awareness of his conduct and of the circumstance of the nonconsent of his victim.”
• Referring to an earlier, but analogous, sexual assault statute, the court stated that “[t]he offense of first degree sexual assault requires that the actor have an awareness of his conduct and of the circumstance of the nonconsent of his victim.”
• requiring analysis of all relevant factors when reviewing jury instructions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).