Skip to main content

Bonser v. Shainholtz

Citations

  • 3 P.3d 422
  • 2000 Colo. J. C.A.R. 3163
  • 2000 Colo. LEXIS 741
  • 2000 WL 744068

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding substantial connection where witness had co-founded the insurance trust and had a financial stake in it
  • admitting evidence to impeach the founder of an insurance trust where a verdict could substantially affect premiums
  • evidence admissible that expert was founder of trust insuring defendant, trust had only 1,500 members and adverse ver diet could substantially affect expert’s premiums
  • relevant evidence may be excluded if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice
  • expert’s relationship with insurance Trust was admissible to show bias where expert was a co-founder and previous board member of Trust, and expert believed dentists insured by Trust were better quality than other dentists
  • expert's relationship with insurance Trust was admissible to show bias where expert was a co-founder and previous board member of Trust, and expert believed dentists insured by Trust were better quality than other dentists

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rice

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Bonser v. Shainholtz

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.