Skip to main content

People v. Smith

Citations

  • 405 N.W.2d 156
  • 158 Mich. App. 220

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \Assuming that such a statement indicates an opinion that Warren was not truthful it would not have been admissible even if Dr. Guhleman had appeared as a witness.\
  • Supreme Court Docket No. 82285, now being held in abeyance
  • Supreme Court Docket No. 82285, now being held in abeyance
  • The prosecutor elicited testimony from a detective that a witness’ trial testimony was identical to two prior statements made by the witness to the detective, and this Court held that the testimony was inadmissible as a prior consistent statement.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Danhof, Shepherd, Hobson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.