Michigan Supreme Court· 9/16/1986

People v. Collier

Citations

393 N.W.2d 346
426 Mich. 23

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

interpreting the Self-Incrimination Clause of Const 1963, art 1, § 17
interpreting the Self-Incrimination Clause of Const 1963, art 1, § 17
pre-arrest silence found admissible because it would have been natural for defendant to report to the police that he had been robbed by the person he was charged with assaulting
no compelling reason to construe the due process and self-incrimination provisions of Const 1963, art 1, § 17 in a manner differently than the parallel provisions of the federal constitution
no compelling reason to construe the due process and self-incrimination provisions of Const 1963, art 1, § 17 in a manner differently than the parallel provisions of the federal constitution
evidence of prearrest silence should not be offered when silence was \natural\ given the circumstances

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Williams, Boyle, Riley, Brickley, Levin, Archer, Cavanagh

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.