People v. Lytal

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• distinguishing Swiderski because “[h]ere, defendant [charged with possession with intent to deliver] and his accomplice . . . did not simultaneously acquire possession of the narcotics at the outset”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).