People v. Dobek

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a prosecutor’s challenged conduct was not an effort to admit evidence in bad- faith where the evidence at issue was “arguably admissible”
• “A sentencing court cannot base a sentence even in part on a defendant’s refusal to admit guilt.”
• prosecutor’s improper questions regarding the defendant’s Catholic beliefs did not deprive the defendant of a fair and impartial trial where the trial court swiftly stopped the line of questioning
• quotation marks and The trial court abuses its discretion “when its decision falls outside the range of reasonable and principled outcomes.” People v Duncan, 494 Mich 713, 722-723; 835 NW2d 399 (2013
• reversal is not warranted on the basis of lack of notice under MRE 404(b)(2) where the other-acts evidence is substantively admissible and where “there is no indication that defendant would have proceeded differently with proper notice.”
• “The listed offenses include the various forms of criminal sexual conduct”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).