Illinois Supreme Court· 10/15/1992
People v. Smith
Citations
- 604 N.E.2d 858
- 152 Ill. 2d 229
- 178 Ill. Dec. 335
- 1992 Ill. LEXIS 143
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that trustworthiness of declarant’s statement “stems not from . . . competency, but rather from the unique (continued...
- finding lack of sufficient time to fabricate where murder witness made statement of police officer within ten minutes of murder
- defendant’s statement of “ ‘leave me alone’ ” was not an invocation of right to silence
- excited utterances are sufficiently reliable to be admitted even where the declarant is incompetent
- “This court has determined that the protections afforded by article I, section 6, of our State constitution against ‘unreasonable’ searches and seizures are substantially identical to those provided by the fourth amendment.”
- no reasonable expectation of privacy in a conversation that occurred in an apartment building’s unlocked common area that was shared by other tenants, the landlord, their social guests, and other invitees
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Clark
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
77 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- People v. WilliamsIllinois Supreme Court· 2000-10-12· cited 413×
- People v. GilliamIllinois Supreme Court· 1996-05-23· cited 328×
- People v. LewisIllinois Supreme Court· 1995-01-19· cited 322×
- People v. KiddIllinois Supreme Court· 1996-12-19· cited 184×
- People v. SmithIllinois Supreme Court· 2000-12-01· cited 165×
- People v. BrownIllinois Supreme Court· 1996-01-18· cited 163×
- People v. KitchenIllinois Supreme Court· 1994-03-24· cited 163×
- People v. JohnsonIllinois Supreme Court· 2006-02-02· cited 153×
- People v. JamesIllinois Supreme Court· 1994-12-22· cited 149×
- People v. LermaIllinois Supreme Court· 2016-03-03· cited 146×
- Nicole Harris v. Sheryl ThompsonSeventh Circuit· 2012-10-18· cited 139×
- People v. WilliamsIllinois Supreme Court· 1994-09-22· cited 139×
- People v. ColemanIllinois Supreme Court· 1994-02-03· cited 138×
- People v. SmithIllinois Supreme Court· 1997-03-20· cited 135×
- People v. SuttonIllinois Supreme Court· 2009-04-16· cited 118×
- People v. TaylorIllinois Supreme Court· 2011-10-06· cited 108×
- People v. NielsonIllinois Supreme Court· 1999-06-17· cited 107×
- People v. BoundsIllinois Supreme Court· 1995-12-21· cited 96×
- People v. LantzIllinois Supreme Court· 1999-04-22· cited 79×
- Hammon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1995-06-30· cited 60×
Cites
58 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-03-27· cited 23,069×
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1967-12-18· cited 13,304×
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court· 1973-05-29· cited 11,783×
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1980-04-15· cited 7,618×
- Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court· 1973-02-21· cited 5,756×
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court· 1980-06-25· cited 5,425×
- Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1968-06-03· cited 4,818×
- Donnelly v. DeChristoforoSupreme Court· 1974-05-13· cited 3,922×
- Washington v. TexasSupreme Court· 1967-06-12· cited 3,395×
- Taylor v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1988-03-28· cited 1,952×
- Morgan v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1992-06-15· cited 1,584×
- White v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1992-01-15· cited 1,508×
- United States v. SantanaSupreme Court· 1976-06-24· cited 1,382×
- California v. CiraoloSupreme Court· 1986-06-30· cited 1,253×
- United States v. InadiSupreme Court· 1986-03-10· cited 682×
- Harold B. Dorman v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1970-04-15· cited 617×
- People v. PrimIllinois Supreme Court· 1972-10-02· cited 576×
- People v. TislerIllinois Supreme Court· 1984-09-20· cited 446×
- People v. HendersonIllinois Supreme Court· 1990-11-30· cited 387×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.