Illinois Supreme Court· 3/21/1996

People v. Smith

Citations

665 N.E.2d 1215
172 Ill. 2d 289
216 Ill. Dec. 658
1996 Ill. LEXIS 34

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that plain language of 625 Ill. Comp. Stat. Ann. 5/11-709 “establishes two separate requirements for lane usage”
holding that the plain language of a statute virtually identical to § 21-309 11 “establishes two separate requirements for lane usage,” to drive in a single lane and move from the lane only after it has been determined that it can be done with safety
noting “a hearing on a petition to rescind the statutory summary suspension of driving privileges is a civil proceeding”
noting \a hearing on a petition to rescind the statutory summary suspension of driving privileges is a civil proceeding\
an officer’s seeing the defendant’s vehicle cross a lane marking gave him probable cause for an arrest for improper lane use
further noting that, given that officer had probable cause, court need not consider officer’s reasonable articulable suspicions surrounding the defendant’s conduct

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Heiple, Harrison, Nickels, Freeman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

47 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.