New York Court of Appeals· 4/2/1992
People v. Smith
Citations
- 79 N.Y.2d 309
- 591 N.E.2d 1132
- 582 N.Y.S.2d 946
- 1992 N.Y. LEXIS 933
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that where no direct evidence of defendant’s mental state exists, the jury must infer mens rea circumstantially
- noting that where no direct evidence of defendant's mental state exists, the jury must infer mens rea circumstantially
- “Often there is no direct evidence of a defendant’s mental state and the jury must infer the mens rea circumstantially from the surrounding facts.”
- “Logically, a defendant cannot act with a specified purpose unless an intent is formed to carry out that purpose. Thus, courts in this State have uniformly read the ‘for the purpose’ language as an intent element of the statute.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kaye, Titone
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
94 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- People v. SteinbergNew York Court of Appeals· 1992-06-11· cited 348×
- People v. SuarezNew York Court of Appeals· 2005-12-22· cited 311×
- People v. RyanNew York Court of Appeals· 1993-12-16· cited 224×
- People v. GordonNew York Court of Appeals· 2014-06-12· cited 144×
- People v. CabassaNew York Court of Appeals· 1992-07-02· cited 73×
- United States v. DesenaSecond Circuit· 2002-04-09· cited 62×
- People v. MillerNew York Court of Appeals· 1995-12-07· cited 61×
- United States v. Pereira-GomezSecond Circuit· 2018-09-07· cited 49×
- People v. HughesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2001-02-01· cited 27×
- People v. DickinsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2020-04-16· cited 21×
- People v. ByrdAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2017-07-20· cited 19×
- People v. AlexanderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2008-04-08· cited 18×
- People v. SanabriaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1999-11-09· cited 18×
- People v. JonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2022-02-17· cited 15×
- In re Kadeem W.New York Court of Appeals· 2005-11-21· cited 14×
- People v. JohnsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2007-03-16· cited 13×
- D.H. v. City of N.Y.S.D. Illinois· 2018-01-09· cited 13×
- Patricia H. v. Richard H.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2010-11-24· cited 11×
- Messana v. MessanaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2014-03-19· cited 11×
- Farrington v. SenkowskiS.D. New York· 1998-09-11· cited 10×
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- People v. ContesNew York Court of Appeals· 1983-09-01· cited 12,727×
- People v. KennedyNew York Court of Appeals· 1979-06-05· cited 363×
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-02-24· cited 112×
- People v. ChessmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1980-06-16· cited 28×
- People v. LopezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1977-06-02· cited 20×
- People v. NixonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1989-12-07· cited 18×
- People v. ChessmanNew York Court of Appeals· 1981-10-29· cited 12×
- People v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1990-10-05· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.