Illinois Supreme Court· 3/25/1983
People v. Smith
Citations
- 447 N.E.2d 809
- 95 Ill. 2d 412
- 69 Ill. Dec. 374
- 1983 Ill. LEXIS 340
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting “the Supreme Court’s interpretation of the automobile exception . . . achieves a fair balance”
- noting “the Supreme Court’s interpretation of the automobile exception . . . achieves a fair balance”
- noting “the Supreme Court’s interpretation of the automobile exception ... achieves a fair balance”
- presence of a “one-hitter box” and hypodermic syringe gave officer probable cause to search entire vehicle
- presence of a \one-hitter box\ and hypodermic syringe gave officer probable cause to search entire vehicle
- probable cause was based on the odor of alcohol and the visible bottle of liquid that appeared to be beer
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Simon
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
57 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- People v. TislerIllinois Supreme Court· 1984-09-20· cited 446×
- People v. JonesIllinois Supreme Court· 2005-05-19· cited 261×
- People v. McCauleyIllinois Supreme Court· 1994-12-22· cited 188×
- State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court· 1986-07-01· cited 168×
- Commonwealth v. CastMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1990-07-11· cited 141×
- State of Iowa v. Jesse Michael GaskinsSupreme Court of Iowa· 2015-06-30· cited 131×
- People v. StoutIllinois Supreme Court· 1985-04-19· cited 125×
- People v. MitchellIllinois Supreme Court· 1995-04-20· cited 111×
- People v. GrantIllinois Supreme Court· 2013-03-14· cited 94×
- State of Iowa v. Christopher George StormSupreme Court of Iowa· 2017-06-30· cited 85×
- People v. RolfingsmeyerIllinois Supreme Court· 1984-02-01· cited 74×
- People v. HillIllinois Supreme Court· 2020-03-19· cited 71×
- People v. DeLunaAppellate Court of Illinois· 2002-09-23· cited 69×
- People v. LedesmaIllinois Supreme Court· 2003-06-19· cited 47×
- United States v. Tony Lawrence GustNinth Circuit· 2005-04-26· cited 43×
- People v. EasleyAppellate Court of Illinois· 1997-05-30· cited 41×
- People v. EvansAppellate Court of Illinois· 1994-03-29· cited 28×
- People v. SmithAppellate Court of Illinois· 2000-08-16· cited 27×
- People v. BradfordAppellate Court of Illinois· 1989-08-25· cited 25×
- People v. GravesAppellate Court of Illinois· 1990-04-17· cited 21×
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1925-11-26· cited 7,454×
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court· 1967-06-12· cited 6,066×
- United States v. CortezSupreme Court· 1981-01-21· cited 5,975×
- United States v. RossSupreme Court· 1982-06-01· cited 3,985×
- New York v. BeltonSupreme Court· 1981-09-23· cited 3,483×
- United States v. ChadwickSupreme Court· 1977-06-21· cited 2,561×
- Arkansas v. SandersSupreme Court· 1979-06-20· cited 1,484×
- Desist v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1969-05-26· cited 1,237×
- United States v. JohnsonSupreme Court· 1982-06-21· cited 1,037×
- MacKey v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1971-04-05· cited 945×
- Robbins v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1981-09-23· cited 503×
- People v. ClarkIllinois Supreme Court· 1982-09-17· cited 85×
- People v. SmithAppellate Court of Illinois· 1978-11-21· cited 25×
- United States v. Mark Charles GrothSixth Circuit· 1982-06-29· cited 24×
- People v. SmithAppellate Court of Illinois· 1982-01-26· cited 8×
- United States v. William Harvey Floyd, David Michael Floyd, George Samuel Floyd, Ronald Martis Ray and Manuel Bocardo Garcia, Jr.Fifth Circuit· 1982-07-19· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.