Appellate Court of Illinois· 12/31/1998
People v. Logan
Citations
- 705 N.E.2d 152
- 302 Ill. App. 3d 319
- 235 Ill. Dec. 539
- 1998 Ill. App. LEXIS 927
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that “[t]he defendant cannot argue that the compilation and dissemination of truthful information that is already, albeit less conveniently, a matter of public record constitutes a legitimate privacy interest”
- making information readily available to the public from the sex offender register was not punishment, thus not violative of the ex post facto clause
- making information readily available to the public from the sex offender register was not punishment, thus not violative of the ex post facto clause
- sex offender registry information is a matter of public record and is not protected by privacy rights
- only personal decisions relating to marriage, procreation, contraception, family relationships, child rearing, and education are within the \zone of privacy\
- absence of a hearing before being required to register did not violate procedural due process
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Geiger
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- People v. MalchowIllinois Supreme Court· 2000-09-21· cited 309×
- People v. CaballesIllinois Supreme Court· 2006-05-18· cited 270×
- State v. KellySupreme Court of Connecticut· 2001-05-08· cited 162×
- People v. CorneliusIllinois Supreme Court· 2004-12-02· cited 146×
- Meinders v. WeberSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2000-01-05· cited 61×
- Kellar v. Fayetteville Police DepartmentSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1999-12-02· cited 57×
- Helman v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2001-11-07· cited 41×
- In Re Phillip C.Appellate Court of Illinois· 2006-03-31· cited 29×
- Dean v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2001-11-08· cited 24×
- People v. JohnsonAppellate Court of Illinois· 2006-01-31· cited 23×
- People v. MalchowAppellate Court of Illinois· 1999-07-22· cited 22×
- In Re JRAppellate Court of Illinois· 2003-06-27· cited 20×
- People v. CarterAppellate Court of Illinois· 2007-10-12· cited 16×
- People v. StanleyAppellate Court of Illinois· 2006-10-30· cited 15×
- People v. GrochockiAppellate Court of Illinois· 2003-08-26· cited 14×
- State v. ArmbrustSupreme Court of Kansas· 2002-12-06· cited 12×
- State v. StevensCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 1999-11-24· cited 10×
- People v. CardonaAppellate Court of Illinois· 2012-03-02· cited 10×
- People v. MarshAppellate Court of Illinois· 2002-03-29· cited 9×
- People v. Traven C.Appellate Court of Illinois· 2008-08-22· cited 9×
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1970-05-04· cited 7,191×
- Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court· 1963-02-18· cited 2,208×
- Kansas v. HendricksSupreme Court· 1997-06-23· cited 2,057×
- State v. CookOhio Supreme Court· 1998-09-30· cited 1,648×
- Flemming v. NestorSupreme Court· 1960-06-20· cited 1,508×
- United States v. UrserySupreme Court· 1996-06-24· cited 1,314×
- Carey v. Population Services InternationalSupreme Court· 1977-06-09· cited 1,185×
- People v. AdamsIllinois Supreme Court· 1991-10-17· cited 201×
- Russell v. GregoireNinth Circuit· 1997-09-04· cited 193×
- Doe v. PatakiSecond Circuit· 1997-08-22· cited 133×
- People v. BurtIllinois Supreme Court· 1995-09-21· cited 101×
- People v. GranadosIllinois Supreme Court· 1996-05-23· cited 64×
- Lanni v. EnglerE.D. Michigan· 1998-02-13· cited 46×
- Doe v. KelleyW.D. Michigan· 1997-03-28· cited 40×
- Doe v. PatakiS.D. New York· 1996-09-24· cited 39×
- People v. MauryAppellate Court of Illinois· 1997-03-11· cited 35×
- People v. StarnesAppellate Court of Illinois· 1995-06-13· cited 33×
- People v. AdamsAppellate Court of Illinois· 1990-06-05· cited 18×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.