Appellate Court of Illinois· 6/27/2003

In Re JR

Citations

793 N.E.2d 687
341 Ill. App. 3d 784
275 Ill. Dec. 916

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that respondent's argument that statute barring expungement of previously submitted blood specimens was unconstitutional was premature because he had made no effort to expunge the information
holding that respondent’s argument that statute barring expungement of previously submitted blood specimens was unconstitutional was premature because he had made no effort to expunge the information
holding that respondent’s argument that statute barring expungement of previously submitted blood specimens was unconstitutional was premature because he had made no effort to expunge the information
holding that respondent’s argument that statute barring expungement of previously submitted blood specimens was unconstitutional was premature because he had made no effort to expunge the information
registration and limited community notification as applied to juvenile sex offenders survive rational basis review
registration and limited community notification as applied to juvenile sex offenders survive rational basis review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Frossard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.