Appellate Court of Illinois· 1/31/2006

People v. Johnson

Citations

843 N.E.2d 434
363 Ill. App. 3d 356
300 Ill. Dec. 176
2006 Ill. App. LEXIS 40

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

finding defendant’s challenge was “more a due process claim than an equal protection claim” where he was not “contending] that the classification of some individuals as sexual offenders is unconstitutional” but, “[r]ather, *** that he does not belong within the classification”
“the Registration Act *** violates [defendant’s] substantive due process rights under the state and federal constitutions where [defendant’s] designation as a sex offender bears no rational relationship to the State’s interest in protecting the public from convicted sex offenders”
\the Registration Act * * * violates [defendant's] substantive due process rights under the state and federal constitutions where [defendant's] designation as a sex offender bears no rational relationship to the State's interest in protecting the public from convicted sex offenders\
Athe Registration Act *** violates [defendant=s] substantive due process rights under the state and federal constitutions where [defendant=s] designation as a sex offender bears no rational relationship to the State's interest in protecting the public from convicted sex offenders@

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hall, Wolfson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.