Doe v. Pataki

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• considering ample anecdotal evidence from other jurisdictions that aggressive notification by law enforcement officials leads to an inappropriately punitive community response
• including several serious incidents in Washington to which the parties stipulated
• describing New York’s Megan’s Law as excessive because it covers individuals such as a “21-year old who engages in sexual intercourse with a 16-year old (who is not a spouse),” a person who engages in incest, and a person who restrains another under the age of 17
• discussion of effects requires consideration of whether the Act imposes an affirmative disability or restraint or increases punishment
• notification provisions based on perceived danger of recidivism posed by sex offenders and public need for protection
• \Notification statutes have resulted in the banishment of sex offenders both literally and psychologically.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

32 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Nos. 96-5132, 96-5416
  Third Circuit· 1997-09-04· cited 301×
• Doe v. Pataki
  S.D. New York· 1998-05-07· cited 192×
• State Ex Rel. Olivieri v. State
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 2001-02-21· cited 155×
• Doe v. Pataki
  Second Circuit· 1997-08-22· cited 133×
• Doe v. Pataki
  Second Circuit· 1997-09-25· cited 96×
• Kaiser v. State
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2002-04-18· cited 53×
• Arizona Department of Public Safety v. Superior Court
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1997-12-16· cited 52×
• People v. Pennington
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 2000-05-22· cited 44×
• People v. Logan
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1998-12-31· cited 44×
• Doe v. Kelley
  W.D. Michigan· 1997-03-28· cited 40×
• State v. Bani
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2001-12-06· cited 40×
• Doe v. Pataki
  Second Circuit· 2007-03-08· cited 39×
• United States v. Coenen
  Fifth Circuit· 1998-02-18· cited 38×
• Van Doren v. Mazurkiewicz
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1997-06-12· cited 25×
• M.G. v. Travis
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1997-12-09· cited 25×
• Doe v. Weld
  D. Massachusetts· 1996-12-17· cited 24×
• Doe v. Gregoire
  W.D. Washington· 1997-03-21· cited 16×
• State v. C.M.
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1999-05-05· cited 12×
• People v. J. G.
  New York Supreme Court· 1996-12-30· cited 9×
• In re Millan
  New York Supreme Court· 2001-05-31· cited 8×

Cites

53 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Farmer v. Brennan
  Supreme Court· 1994-06-06· cited 28,443×
• Furman v. Georgia
  Supreme Court· 1972-06-29· cited 5,066×
• Landgraf v. USI Film Products
  Supreme Court· 1994-04-26· cited 4,825×
• Weaver v. Graham
  Supreme Court· 1981-02-24· cited 2,482×
• Kennedy v. Mendoza-Martinez
  Supreme Court· 1963-02-18· cited 2,208×
• Trop v. Dulles
  Supreme Court· 1958-03-31· cited 2,182×
• United States Department of Justice v. Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press
  Supreme Court· 1989-03-22· cited 2,142×
• United States v. Halper
  Supreme Court· 1989-05-15· cited 1,945×
• Austin v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1993-06-28· cited 1,908×
• Collins v. Youngblood
  Supreme Court· 1990-06-21· cited 1,864×
• Calder v. Bull
  Supreme Court· 1798-08-17· cited 1,860×
• United States v. Harriss
  Supreme Court· 1954-06-07· cited 1,827×
• Whalen v. Roe
  Supreme Court· 1977-02-22· cited 1,722×
• Miller v. Florida
  Supreme Court· 1987-06-09· cited 1,316×
• United States v. Ursery
  Supreme Court· 1996-06-24· cited 1,314×
• Marchetti v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1968-01-29· cited 1,283×
• City of Richmond v. J. A. Croson Co.
  Supreme Court· 1989-01-23· cited 1,149×
• California Department of Corrections v. Morales
  Supreme Court· 1995-04-25· cited 1,142×
• Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp. v. Bonjorno
  Supreme Court· 1990-06-04· cited 1,050×
• Department of Revenue of Mont. v. Kurth Ranch
  Supreme Court· 1994-06-06· cited 1,050×