Skip to main content
· 12/6/2002

State v. Armbrust

Citations

  • 59 P.3d 1000
  • 274 Kan. 1089
  • 2002 Kan. LEXIS 784

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • 'So long as the actual criminal violation for which the defendant is being charged occurred after the effective date of the statute providing punishment for the violation, there is no violation of the Ex Post Facto Clause of the United States Constitution.'

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Allegrucci

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.