Skip to main content

People v. Vaughn

Citations

  • 491 Mich. 642
  • 821 N.W.2d 288
  • 2012 Mich. LEXIS 1017

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that failing to object to an improper courtroom closure results in forfeiture, not waiver, of the public-trial right
  • recognizing that the right to counsel encompasses the right to the effective assistance of counsel
  • recognizing that the right to counsel encompasses the right to the effective assistance of counsel
  • holding that the closure of a courtroom during jury selection, a structural error, did not seriously affect the fairness, integrity, or public reputation of judicial proceedings
  • holding that the closure of a courtroom during jury selection, a structural error, did not seriously affect the fairness, integrity, or public reputation of the judicial proceedings
  • suggesting that it may be reasonable for counsel to determine that a closed voir dire will facilitate honest answers from prospective jurors

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Markman, Kelly, Zahra, Young, Hathaway, Cavanagh

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

74 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

68 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named People v. Vaughn

120 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.