Skip to main content

People v. Mitchell

Citations

  • 604 N.E.2d 877
  • 152 Ill. 2d 274
  • 178 Ill. Dec. 354
  • 1992 Ill. LEXIS 152

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a defendant need not interrupt a trial court to correct a trial court’s misapprehension after defense counsel has just argued the same to the court
  • noting that the introduction of photographs of victims while alive would not render a proceeding fundamentally unfair
  • noting that the introduction of photographs of victims while alive would not render a proceeding fundamentally unfair
  • observing that the harmless-error rule applies to confessions allegedly obtained in violation of the fifth amendment
  • rejecting the State’s argument that the trial court did not find a witness credible where the trial court never said that
  • finding that the admission of the defendant’s involuntary statement was harmless where the evidence of his guilt was overwhelming because the defendant also confessed his guilt to someone other than the police and physical evidence also linked him to the crime

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cunningham

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

110 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

64 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.