Skip to main content

People v. Evans

Citations

  • 186 Ill. 2d 83
  • 237 Ill. Dec. 118
  • 708 N.E.2d 1158
  • 1999 Ill. LEXIS 21

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding, in the context of post-conviction review, that trial counsel was not ineffective for failing to object to evidence and argument which was previously found on direct appeal to be nonprejudicial
  • holding defense counsel was not ineffective for failing to elicit testimony regarding defendant’s extreme emotional disturbance to justify murder where defendant claimed innocence
  • holding, in the context of post-conviction review, that trial counsel was not ineffective for failing to object to evidence and argument which was previously found on direct appeal to be nonprejudicial
  • “Proof of defendant’s mental handicaps not only could evoke compassion from the trial judge, but also could have demonstrated defendant’s continued dangerousness”
  • “The judge could have regarded defendant’s troubled life, with his criminal record, as an indicator of defendant’s future dangerousness”
  • “A petitioner cannot obtain relief under the Act by rephrasing issues, which were previously addressed, in constitutional terms”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Freeman, Heiple, Rathje, Harrison

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

142 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

41 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.