Skip to main content

People v. Durapau

Citations

  • 280 P.3d 42
  • 2012 COA 67
  • 2011 WL 1587413
  • 2011 Colo. App. LEXIS 650

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying CSORA’s registration requirement to an adult who was found not guilty by reason of insanity of sexual assault
  • declining to review constitutional challenge to statute where the defendant presented bare and conclusory arguments
  • declining to address bare and conclusory contentions made without any supporting argument or analysis
  • “Unless the context indicates otherwise, the word ‘shall’ generally indicates that the General Assembly intended the provision to be mandatory.”
  • “The statutory scheme[ for sex offender registration] . . . indicates that registration is not punitive, but rather aids law enforcement in investigating future crimes and promotes public safety.”
  • declining to consider conclusory constitutional arguments

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hawthorne, Richman, Roman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.