Colorado Court of Appeals· 4/28/2011
People v. Durapau
Citations
- 280 P.3d 42
- 2012 COA 67
- 2011 WL 1587413
- 2011 Colo. App. LEXIS 650
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- applying CSORA’s registration requirement to an adult who was found not guilty by reason of insanity of sexual assault
- declining to review constitutional challenge to statute where the defendant presented bare and conclusory arguments
- declining to address bare and conclusory contentions made without any supporting argument or analysis
- “Unless the context indicates otherwise, the word ‘shall’ generally indicates that the General Assembly intended the provision to be mandatory.”
- “The statutory scheme[ for sex offender registration] . . . indicates that registration is not punitive, but rather aids law enforcement in investigating future crimes and promotes public safety.”
- declining to consider conclusory constitutional arguments
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hawthorne, Richman, Roman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- People v. DuranColorado Court of Appeals· 2015-10-08· cited 873×
- Parental Responsibilities Concerning D.P.GColorado Court of Appeals· 2020-07-23· cited 819×
- v. DyerColorado Court of Appeals· 2019-10-24· cited 727×
- People v. AllmanColorado Court of Appeals· 2012-12-06· cited 249×
- People v. MendozaColorado Court of Appeals· 2011-10-13· cited 187×
- People v. RiceColorado Court of Appeals· 2015-11-19· cited 180×
- v. CurtisColorado Court of Appeals· 2021-08-17· cited 59×
- People v. RelafordColorado Court of Appeals· 2016-06-30· cited 45×
- People v. LientzColorado Court of Appeals· 2012-07-19· cited 13×
- The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Petitioner/Cross-Respondent, IN the INTEREST OF T.B., Respondent/Cross-PetitionerSupreme Court of Colorado· 2021-06-28· cited 12×
- in Interest of T.BColorado Court of Appeals· 2019-06-20· cited 5×
- People v. LaekeColorado Court of Appeals· 2018-05-31· cited 4×
- Marquez v. SchaeferColorado Court of Appeals· 2025-05-01· cited 4×
- People in Interest of DiazColorado Court of Appeals· 2024-09-05· cited 1×
Cites
35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Kansas v. HendricksSupreme Court· 1997-06-23· cited 2,057×
- Castillo v. Koppes-ConwayColorado Court of Appeals· 2006-06-15· cited 1,524×
- Smith v. DoeSupreme Court· 2003-03-05· cited 1,492×
- People v. KellingColorado Court of Appeals· 2006-11-30· cited 1,233×
- Valentine v. Mountain States Mutual Casualty Co.Colorado Court of Appeals· 2011-01-06· cited 1,127×
- Bruce v. City of Colorado SpringsColorado Court of Appeals· 2010-06-10· cited 611×
- People v. District Court, Second Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado· 1986-01-31· cited 457×
- O'QUINN v. BacaColorado Court of Appeals· 2010-01-07· cited 127×
- People v. HickmanSupreme Court of Colorado· 1999-11-08· cited 88×
- People v. DiefenderferSupreme Court of Colorado· 1989-12-04· cited 81×
- People v. ChavezSupreme Court of Colorado· 1981-06-01· cited 77×
- Leick v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 1958-01-13· cited 67×
- People v. JanousekSupreme Court of Colorado· 1994-04-04· cited 58×
- People v. SimpsonColorado Court of Appeals· 2004-02-26· cited 46×
- Whitaker v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 2002-06-03· cited 45×
- People v. SerravoSupreme Court of Colorado· 1992-01-13· cited 42×
- People v. TuffoColorado Court of Appeals· 2009-04-30· cited 36×
- Riley v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 2004-12-20· cited 36×
- People v. SteadColorado Court of Appeals· 2002-08-15· cited 32×
- Department of Transportation v. City of Idaho SpringsColorado Court of Appeals· 2008-05-01· cited 30×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.