Skip to main content

People v. Simpson

Citations

  • 93 P.3d 551
  • 2003 WL 22508897

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • declining to consider an argument presented for the first time in a reply brief
  • refusing to consider contention presented in a footnote that was not set forth in the summary of argument or as an issue on appeal in the opening brief as required by C.A.R. 28(a)
  • reviewing court will not consider bald legal proposition presented without argument or development
  • declining to consider 14 “a bald legal proposition presented without argument or development”
  • declining “to consider a bald legal proposition presented without argument or development”
  • declining to address “a bald legal proposition” not developed with supporting argument

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hume, Marquez, Dailey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.