Skip to main content
· 4/30/2009

People v. Tuffo

Citations

  • 209 P.3d 1226
  • 2009 Colo. App. LEXIS 711
  • 2009 WL 1152142

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that a sentencing court may rely on uncontroverted facts in the presentence report
  • noting that the “SVP statute is protective rather than punitive”
  • remanding for specific factual findings on contested issues underlying the SVP designat ion
  • “[T]he registration and notification requirements established in the SVP statute are intended to protect the community rather than punish the offender.”
  • registration and notification requirements in the SVP statute are intended to protect the community rather than punish the offender; thus, they do not violate the ex post facto restriction even if applied retroactively to offenders

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Connelly, Casebolt, Roy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.