· 4/30/2009
People v. Tuffo
Citations
- 209 P.3d 1226
- 2009 Colo. App. LEXIS 711
- 2009 WL 1152142
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that a sentencing court may rely on uncontroverted facts in the presentence report
- noting that the “SVP statute is protective rather than punitive”
- remanding for specific factual findings on contested issues underlying the SVP designat ion
- “[T]he registration and notification requirements established in the SVP statute are intended to protect the community rather than punish the offender.”
- registration and notification requirements in the SVP statute are intended to protect the community rather than punish the offender; thus, they do not violate the ex post facto restriction even if applied retroactively to offenders
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Connelly, Casebolt, Roy
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.