Castillo v. Koppes-Conway

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that it is the litigant’s duty to locate and synthesize relevant facts and arguments
• recognizing that it is the litigant’s duty to locate and synthesize relevant facts and arguments, and this duty should not be given to the appellate court
• noting that it’s not the appellate court’s task to locate and synthesize the relevant facts, arguments, and legal authority
• noting that it isn’t the appellate court’s task to locate and synthesize the relevant facts, arguments, and legal authority
• declining to consider contention not fully briefed or supported with pertinent authority
• refusing to consider contentions on appeal because the opening brief set forth no cogent argument and violated C.A.R. 28

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).