Supreme Court of Colorado· 6/1/1981
People v. Chavez
Citations
- 629 P.2d 1040
- 1981 Colo. LEXIS 696
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that “mental illness for the most part is a long lasting phenomenon.”
- recognizing that \mental illness for the most part is a long lasting phenomenon.\
- Court notes that the statutory scheme governing criminal committees “contemplates that the defendant’s present need for care and treatment ... will be addressed.”
- “A plea of not guilty by reason of insanity is a plea in the nature of confession and avoidance.”
- not guilty by reason of insanity is plea in nature of confession and avoidance
- pertinent statutes do not violate equal protection or due process
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Quinn
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
60 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- People v. MedinaSupreme Court of Colorado· 1985-09-09· cited 652×
- Gohier v. EnrightTenth Circuit· 1999-08-03· cited 232×
- Blehm v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 1991-09-23· cited 186×
- People v. DurapauColorado Court of Appeals· 2011-04-28· cited 178×
- People v. RiggsSupreme Court of Colorado· 2004-03-08· cited 175×
- Watso v. Colorado Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of Colorado· 1992-11-23· cited 63×
- Matter of Estate of DaigleSupreme Court of Colorado· 1981-09-21· cited 59×
- People v. LowSupreme Court of Colorado· 1987-02-17· cited 51×
- United States v. Jeffrey I. CohenD.C. Circuit· 1984-05-04· cited 46×
- People v. DashColorado Court of Appeals· 2004-08-12· cited 46×
- Tassian v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 1987-01-20· cited 41×
- Dawson ex rel. McKelvey v. Public Employees' Retirement Ass'nSupreme Court of Colorado· 1983-05-31· cited 37×
- Loup-Miller Construction Co. v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado· 1984-02-14· cited 28×
- Sears, Roebuck and Co. v. BacaSupreme Court of Colorado· 1984-04-30· cited 24×
- People v. HillSupreme Court of Colorado· 1997-03-17· cited 24×
- Marshall v. KortSupreme Court of Colorado· 1984-10-22· cited 23×
- Robinson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1983-12-23· cited 21×
- Charles L. Parrish v. State of Colorado Gale A. Norton, Attorney GeneralTenth Circuit· 1996-03-05· cited 20×
- People v. GillilandSupreme Court of Colorado· 1989-02-13· cited 20×
- People v. WhiteSupreme Court of Colorado· 1983-01-10· cited 20×
Cites
50 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court· 1976-02-24· cited 16,859×
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court· 1974-06-26· cited 12,327×
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court· 1972-06-29· cited 10,835×
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court· 1970-05-04· cited 5,926×
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court· 1973-05-14· cited 5,755×
- San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court· 1973-04-23· cited 3,699×
- Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1963-04-29· cited 3,330×
- Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1952-01-07· cited 3,056×
- Addington v. TexasSupreme Court· 1979-04-30· cited 3,004×
- Craig v. BorenSupreme Court· 1976-12-20· cited 2,156×
- Loving v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 1967-06-12· cited 2,147×
- Vitek v. JonesSupreme Court· 1980-03-25· cited 1,747×
- Graham v. RichardsonSupreme Court· 1971-06-14· cited 1,494×
- United States v. BaileySupreme Court· 1980-01-21· cited 1,333×
- Jackson v. IndianaSupreme Court· 1972-06-07· cited 1,284×
- Specht v. PattersonSupreme Court· 1967-05-29· cited 837×
- Humphrey v. CadySupreme Court· 1972-03-22· cited 784×
- Baxstrom v. HeroldSupreme Court· 1966-02-23· cited 762×
- Lynch v. OverholserSupreme Court· 1962-05-21· cited 478×
- Sailors v. Board of Ed. of Kent Cty.Supreme Court· 1967-05-22· cited 355×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.