Skip to main content

People v. Adams

Citations

  • 627 N.W.2d 623
  • 245 Mich. App. 226

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding, under Davis 's objective standard, that suspect's statement-\Can I talk to him [a lawyer] right now?\-was insufficient to invoke suspect's right to counsel and declining to suppress suspect's statement (alteration in original)
  • declining to view transcript words cited by the defendant in isolation and examining the “context” and “circumstances” surrounding the defendant’s statement alleged to be an unequivocal assertion of the right to counsel
  • “The question here is whether defendant’s statement . . . constitutes a clear request for an attorney.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Collins, Jansen, Whitbeck

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.