Skip to main content

People v. Williams

Citations

  • 737 N.W.2d 797
  • 275 Mich. App. 194

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a Ginther hearing is not warranted where the “defendant has not set forth any additional facts that would require development of a record to determine if defense counsel was ineffective[.]”
  • holding that a Ginther hearing is not warranted where the “defendant has not set forth any additional facts that would require development of a record to determine if defense counsel was ineffective[.]”
  • providing that the defendant must set forth facts that demonstrate the need for an evidentiary hearing
  • providing that the defendant must set forth facts that demonstrate the need for an evidentiary hearing
  • providing that the defendant must set forth facts that demonstrate the need for an evidentiary hearing
  • denying requested remand where the defendant failed to “set forth any additional facts that would require development of a record to determine if defense counsel was ineffective”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wilder, Sawyer, Davis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.