People v. Conte

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a “promise need not be express, as subtle imitations [sic] can convey as much as express statements,” and concluding that “there is no room for a distinction between tacit and express understandings” (quotation and brackets omitted)
• stating that a “promise need not be express, as subtle intimations can convey as much as express statements,” and concluding that “there is no room for a distinction between tacit and express understandings” (quotation and brackets omitted)
• setting up two-prong test for voluntariness determination

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).