Skip to main content

Pacheco v. State

Citations

  • 698 So. 2d 593
  • 1997 WL 428524

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the trial court erred in allowing the State on redirect examination to introduce co-defendant's statements against defendant where defense only opened the door to testimony that co-defendant had led police to suspect defendant
  • holding that defense opened door to question explaining that codefendant had implicated defendant but defense “did not throw the door open wide enough to admit” the substance of codefendant’s hearsay statement to detective
  • holding that the trial court erred in allowing the State on redirect examination to introduce co-defendant’s statements against defendant where defense only opened the door to testimony that co-defendant had led police to suspect defendant
  • holding that the State was properly allowed to ask whether the co-defendant had implicated the defendant, but defense “did not throw the door open wide enough to admit” the substance of co-defendant’s hearsay statement to detective

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Northcutt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.