Wright v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defense counsel on cross examination opened the door to allow the State on redirect examination to introduce statements of accomplice inculpating defendant
• holding that defense counsel on cross examination opened the door to allow the State on redirect examination to introduce statements of accomplice inculpating defendant
• three questions concerning source of incriminating statement opened door to entire statement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Childers v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-02-02· cited 27×
• Pacheco v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-08-01· cited 16×
• Cartwright v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-11-03· cited 13×
• Walsh v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-04-01· cited 4×
• Dixon v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-02-04· cited 3×
• Watson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-07-15· cited 1×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Bruton v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1968-06-17· cited 8,792×
• Tompkins v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1986-12-30· cited 95×
• Walton v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1985-12-19· cited 25×
• Hall v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1979-12-20· cited 19×
• Hinton v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1977-07-06· cited 14×
• Adamson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-10-09· cited 6×