Skip to main content

Childers v. State

Citations

  • 936 So. 2d 585
  • 2006 WL 2620262

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that “includes” introduced a non-exhaustive list
  • “Including but not limited to” is “essential to defeat three canons of construction [including]: includio unius est exclusio alteris (‘To express one thing is to exclude the other).”
  • “Under the rules of evidence, Appellant could attack Junior’s credibility by ‘showing that a witness is biased.’”
  • interpreting “includes” in section 1.01(3), Florida Statutes (2002), expansively

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

124 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.