Neilson v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that testimony regarding out-of-court identification was inadmissible where the state failed to ask the witnesses about the identification during its direct examination
• holding that testimony regarding out-of-court identification was inadmissible where the state failed to ask the witnesses about the identification during its direct examination
• noting that occupancy is an essential element of first-degree arson

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Polite v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-07-16· cited 11×
• Vernon Stevens v. State of Florida
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2017-09-14· cited 5×
• Deans v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-08-29· cited 2×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Freber
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1978-12-21· cited 59×
• Pacheco v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-08-01· cited 16×
• Erwin v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-09-22· cited 5×