Skip to main content
First Circuit· 4/12/2000

O'Neill v. Carlisle

Citations

  • 210 F.3d 41
  • 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 6675
  • 2000 WL 361655

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that actions taken by an - 32 - employer in preparation for an employee's planned termination did not violate due process where the termination decision remained subject to revision
  • finding six days' notice sufficient when plaintiff understood the nature of the charges three months earlier
  • “The Supreme Court has clearly said that the Eleventh Amendment bars federal suits by citizens against the state or state agencies.”
  • “[A] very limited hearing prior to termination [is] sufficient, provided that it [is] followed by a more comprehensive post-termination hearing.”
  • “The state procedures prescribed by chapter 31, sections 41-44 of the Massachusetts General Laws clearly fulfill the due process requirements for pre-termination notice and opportunity to be heard.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Selya, Boudin, Lynch

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

56 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.