First Circuit· 4/12/2000
O'Neill v. Carlisle
Citations
- 210 F.3d 41
- 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 6675
- 2000 WL 361655
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that actions taken by an - 32 - employer in preparation for an employee's planned termination did not violate due process where the termination decision remained subject to revision
- finding six days' notice sufficient when plaintiff understood the nature of the charges three months earlier
- “The Supreme Court has clearly said that the Eleventh Amendment bars federal suits by citizens against the state or state agencies.”
- “[A] very limited hearing prior to termination [is] sufficient, provided that it [is] followed by a more comprehensive post-termination hearing.”
- “The state procedures prescribed by chapter 31, sections 41-44 of the Massachusetts General Laws clearly fulfill the due process requirements for pre-termination notice and opportunity to be heard.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Selya, Boudin, Lynch
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
56 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Wojcik v. Massachusettts State Lottery CommissionFirst Circuit· 2002-08-20· cited 163×
- González-Droz v. González-ColónFirst Circuit· 2011-09-16· cited 153×
- Torres-Rosado v. Rotger-SabatFirst Circuit· 2003-07-02· cited 136×
- Cepero-Rivera v. FagundoFirst Circuit· 2005-07-01· cited 130×
- Roger Luder v. Jeffrey P. EndicottSeventh Circuit· 2001-06-15· cited 119×
- Hadfield v. McDonoughFirst Circuit· 2005-05-11· cited 78×
- Whalen v. Massachusetts Trial CourtFirst Circuit· 2005-02-04· cited 77×
- Brait Builders Corp. v. Massachusetts, Division of Capital Asset ManagementFirst Circuit· 2011-05-02· cited 69×
- San Gerónimo Caribe Project, Inc. v. Acevedo-ViláFirst Circuit· 2012-07-24· cited 61×
- Chmielinski v. MassachusettsFirst Circuit· 2008-01-22· cited 51×
- Senra v. Town of SmithfieldFirst Circuit· 2013-05-03· cited 46×
- Mercado-Alicea v. P.R. Tourism Co.First Circuit· 2005-01-27· cited 44×
- Gomes v. University of Maine SystemD. Maine· 2004-02-23· cited 32×
- Duriex-Gauthier v. Lopez-NievesFirst Circuit· 2001-12-14· cited 24×
- Collins v. University of New HampshireFirst Circuit· 2011-12-20· cited 24×
- Román v. University of Puerto RicoD. Puerto Rico· 2011-07-27· cited 19×
- Calderon-Garnier v. RodriguezFirst Circuit· 2009-08-24· cited 16×
- 3137, LLC v. Town of HarwichFirst Circuit· 2025-01-13· cited 13×
- Learnard v. Inhabitants of Town of Van BurenD. Maine· 2002-01-29· cited 12×
- Quinn v. GrimesSupreme Court of Vermont· 2004-09-10· cited 11×
Cites
25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court· 1978-06-06· cited 41,449×
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court· 1989-06-15· cited 14,197×
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court· 1984-01-23· cited 8,956×
- Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court· 1984-07-03· cited 8,014×
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court· 1985-03-19· cited 6,903×
- Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court· 1981-05-18· cited 6,693×
- Carey v. PiphusSupreme Court· 1978-03-21· cited 3,438×
- Zinermon v. BurchSupreme Court· 1990-02-27· cited 3,290×
- College Savings Bank v. Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense BoardSupreme Court· 1999-06-23· cited 1,377×
- Gilbert v. HomarSupreme Court· 1997-06-09· cited 838×
- Ronald C. Brown v. Hot, Sexy and Safer Productions, Inc.First Circuit· 1995-10-23· cited 351×
- Myrtle Thomas v. Eastman Kodak CompanyFirst Circuit· 1999-07-15· cited 256×
- Houlton Citizens' Coalition v. Town of HoultonFirst Circuit· 1999-04-22· cited 240×
- Romero-Barcelo v. Hernandez-AgostoFirst Circuit· 1996-01-31· cited 195×
- Leroy H. Johnson, Jr. v. Alex Rodriguez, Etc.First Circuit· 1991-10-09· cited 188×
- Donald Roy, of Waterville, Kennebec County, State of Maine v. The City of Augusta, MaineFirst Circuit· 1983-07-28· cited 146×
- Wang v. New Hampshire Board of Registration in MedicineFirst Circuit· 1995-06-06· cited 123×
- Carleen Bowen, Etc. v. City of ManchesterFirst Circuit· 1992-06-05· cited 121×
- National Foreign Trade Council v. NatsiosFirst Circuit· 1999-06-22· cited 117×
- Lynn C. Lowe, M.D. v. H. Denman Scott, M.D.First Circuit· 1992-03-18· cited 114×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.