Brait Builders Corp. v. Massachusetts, Division of Capital Asset Management

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• indicating that Rule 4 applies when “an amended complaint . . . adds 26 defendants” to an action
• first quoting Hudson Sav. Bank v. Austin, 479 F.3d 102, 109 (1st Cir. 2007) and then quoting Calderon v. Ashmus, 523 U.S. 740, 745 n.2 (1998)
• “‘An amended complaint, once filed, normally supersedes the antecedent complaint,’ and causes the latter to ‘no longer perform[ ] any function in the case.’” (quoting Connectu LLC v. Zuckerberg, 522 F.3d 82, 91 (1st Cir.2008))
• “‘An amended complaint, once filed, normally supersedes the antecedent complaint,’ and causes the latter to ‘no longer perform[ ] any function in the case.’ ” (alteration in original) (quoting Co nnectu LLC v. Zuckerberg, 522 F.3d 82, 91 (1st Cir. 2008)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).