Chmielinski v. Massachusetts

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that conduct of a termination hearing was not random and unauthorized because it was done in accordance with the state-law statutory and regulatory scheme
• stating that Loudermill requirements are not met when “an[] error of primary facts in the grounds used for termination [] [can] be explained only by bias”
• noting that “[a] key concern in Loudermill was that the employee have an opportunity to present his side of things to correct errors of fact on which the termination decision is based”
• noting the requirements, that a pre-termination hearing provide notice, an explanation of the evidence and an opportunity to respond
• noting the requirements that a pre-termination hearing provide notice, an explanation of the evidence and an opportunity to respond
• noting that an explanation of the employer's evidence is also required

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).