Torres-Rosado v. Rotger-Sabat

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “an agency’s failure to follow its own rules may be significant in administrative law, but the federal due process clause does not incorporate the particular procedural structures enacted by state or local governments”
• finding that “far more than the minimum elements” of due process were met when plaintiff was accompanied by counsel at hearing, testified, and had opportunity to present evidence
• explaining that failure timely to oppose summary judgment \does not mean the unopposed party [automatically] wins\
• holding no deprivation of property interest because the suspension with pay “caused only a very temporary deprivation of job functions and no financial loss”
• holding no deprivation of property interest because the suspension with pay \caused only a very temporary deprivation of job functions and no financial loss\
• explaining that Supreme Court “rejected a categorical rule imposing constitutional due process requirements on suspensions without pay”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).