Skip to main content
· 4/22/1999

Houlton Citizens' Coalition v. Town of Houlton

Citations

  • 175 F.3d 178
  • 29 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 21086
  • 48 ERC (BNA) 1443
  • 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 7951
  • 1999 WL 228274

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that “[t]he dormant Commerce Clause does not affect state or local regulations directly authorized by Congress”
  • explaining that the court of appeals reviews the entry of summary judgment de novo
  • explaining that the court of appeals may affirm an order for summary judgment “on any ground revealed by the record”
  • noting that “if local legislation leaves all comers with equal access to the local market, it does not offend the dormant Commerce Clause”
  • explaining that the court of appeals reviews the entry of summary judgment de novo
  • explaining that \[t]he dormant Commerce Clause does not affect state or local regulations directly authorized by Congress\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Selya, Stahl, Lipez

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.